Money does not move on a fit-out because someone asked nicely. It moves along a chain of four documents, and each one proves something different. Skip one and you lose the ability to argue later — about quality, about quantity, or about what was actually agreed.
The cleanest way to learn the chain is to follow a single marble supply from the first phone call to the last payment.
The marble supply
A villa reception needs 22 square metres of Crema Marfil feature cladding. Here is the chain, end to end.
| Step | Document | What it proves | Who raises it |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | RFQ — Request for Quotation | That you asked a defined question, to named suppliers, against a spec | You, the contractor |
| 2 | Quotation | What the supplier offered, at what rate, on what lead time, valid until when | The supplier |
| 3 | PO — Purchase Order | That you committed to buy the agreed thing, at the agreed price, for the agreed date | You, the contractor |
| 4 | Delivery note | What physically arrived, when, in what quantities | The supplier’s driver |
| 5 | GRN — Goods Received Note | That you checked what arrived against the order, and accepted or rejected it | Your site team |
| 6 | Invoice | What the supplier is now owed, against the accepted delivery | The supplier |
| 7 | Retention release | The final slice paid after the defects period | You, the contractor |
Read the table left to right and it looks bureaucratic. Read it as a story and each document is doing one job — closing off one argument before the next can start.
RFQ — asking the question properly
The RFQ is the question you send to suppliers. Its job is to make sure every supplier is quoting the same thing, so the numbers you get back are actually comparable.
A weak RFQ says “marble for the villa, give me a price”. Three suppliers will quote three different stones, three different thicknesses, three different lead times, and you will have learned nothing.
A proper RFQ names the stone, the thickness, the finish, the square metres, the delivery address, and the date you need it. Now the only variable is the supplier’s number, and the comparison is honest.
PO — committing to buy
The quotation told you what the supplier would do. The PO is you committing to it. Until the PO is raised, nothing is ordered and no lead-time clock has started.
The PO also locks the price. Without it, the supplier can invoice at today’s rate, which on long-lead stone can move noticeably between order and delivery.
GRN — the line between their problem and yours
The GRN is the most under-used document on site, and the one that costs the most when it is skipped. It is the record of what you actually received, checked against what you ordered.
When the marble lands, the site team opens the crates before the fixing gang touches it. Right stone, right thickness, right finish, right quantity, no chipped edges. If it matches the PO, the GRN is signed and the goods are accepted. If it does not, it is rejected on the spot, the supplier is notified, and the disputed marble stays in their name.
This is the single most expensive habit on a fit-out. Stone checked on the pallet is the supplier’s problem. Stone checked on the wall is yours.
Retention — the leverage that stays until the end
Retention is the slice of each payment held back until after the defects period. Common practice is five to ten percent of the supplier’s valuation, retained and released only when the work is confirmed sound at the end of the defects liability period — often three to twelve months after handover.
It is not a penalty. It is leverage. The supplier knows the final slice is held against the small defects that always surface after the main work is done — a hollow-sounding tile, a joint that opens, a polish that dulls. Fix them, and the retention releases. Ignore them, and the client holds it.
Pay the supplier in full against each invoice and you have surrendered the only tool that makes them come back. Retention is what keeps the after-care honest.
What goes wrong when one is skipped
The chain is only as strong as its weakest link. Skip the RFQ and you cannot compare quotes honestly. Skip the PO and you cannot prove what was ordered, or lock the price. Skip the GRN and you cannot reject defective goods — you have accepted them by fixing them. Skip retention and you cannot compel the supplier to return for defects.
Each document closes one argument. Miss one, and that argument arrives later, when it is more expensive and harder to win.
What this looks like in Taskity
A purchase order is raised against a BOQ line, with a supplier, a rate, and a delivery date. When goods arrive, a goods-received entry is logged against the PO, accepting or rejecting quantity. Invoices and payments — including the retention held and later released — all attach to the same order, so the chain from request to final release is one record.
Check what you learned
1. Marble arrives on site and the fixing gang starts immediately — but no GRN has been raised. What is the real risk?
Show the answer
The marble might be the wrong colour, and there is no documented state to reject from
The GRN is the moment you accept or reject the goods against the order. By fixing before checking, the team has silently accepted the stone as supplied — wrong shade, short quantity, chipped edges and all. Once it is on the wall, proving it arrived defective is near impossible, and the supplier can fairly say the damage happened on site. The GRN is the line between their problem and yours.
2. Why is retention held back from each payment, rather than paid in full against the invoice?
Show the answer
To keep leverage so defects found after the main work are actually put right
Once a supplier has been paid in full, they have no financial reason to return for a chipped tile or a misaligned joint. Retention is the slice of each valuation — commonly five to ten percent — held back until the defects period ends and the work is confirmed sound. It is leverage, not a penalty: fix the defects and the retention releases in full.
Scored quizzes, progress tracking and certificates live inside Taskity.
Next: Getting paid: valuations, progress billing and the cash-flow trap →